From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perloff v. Kelmenson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Opinion

March, 1929.


Order denying defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that plaintiff's claim has been released modified so that it shall provide that the questions of fact as to the validity of the release shall be tried by a jury, whose findings shall be reported to the court for its action. (Rules Civ. Prac. rule 108.) As so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Lazansky, P.J., Rich, Kapper, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Perloff v. Kelmenson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1929
226 App. Div. 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)
Case details for

Perloff v. Kelmenson

Case Details

Full title:MARK A. PERLOFF, Respondent, v. NATHAN KELMENSON, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1929

Citations

226 App. Div. 696 (N.Y. App. Div. 1929)

Citing Cases

Horlick v. Horlick

Judgment dismissing complaint, entered on the foregoing order, reversed on the law and the facts, with costs…

Campbell v. Muncie

November, 1935. In an action to recover damages for alienation of affections, order granting defendant Curtis…