From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PERLMAN v. I. BLYN SONS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1913
155 App. Div. 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)

Opinion

February, 1913.

Present — Ingraham, P.J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ.


The judgment and order appealed from should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event, on the ground that the counsel for the plaintiff asked a witness on the stand: "Are you connected with this insurance company that is in this case?" That question having been asked, counsel for the defendant moved to withdraw a juror and to have a mistrial declared, on the ground that it was sought to prejudice the rights of the defendant to a fair and impartial trial. (See Akin v. Lee, 206 N.Y. 20.)


Judgment and order reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event. Order to be settled on notice.


Summaries of

PERLMAN v. I. BLYN SONS

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 1, 1913
155 App. Div. 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)
Case details for

PERLMAN v. I. BLYN SONS

Case Details

Full title:DAVID A. PERLMAN, an Infant, by ISAAC PERLMAN, His Guardian ad Litem…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 1, 1913

Citations

155 App. Div. 888 (N.Y. App. Div. 1913)