From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perks v. Vasbinder

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 8, 2006
Case No. 05-CV-72657-DT (E.D. Mich. Sep. 8, 2006)

Summary

indicating that due process is not violated by short order denying leave to appeal for lack of merit as opposed to detailed appellate opinion as both consider case merits

Summary of this case from Wright v. Vasbinder

Opinion

Case No. 05-CV-72657-DT.

September 8, 2006


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives' Report and Recommendation dated July 17, 2006. No objections were filed thereto.

This Court has had an opportunity to fully review this matter and believes that the Magistrate Judge has reached the correct conclusions for the proper reasons.

ACCORDINGLY:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Paul J. Komives' Report and Recommendation dated July 17, 2006, is hereby accepted and adopted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus is denied.


Summaries of

Perks v. Vasbinder

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Sep 8, 2006
Case No. 05-CV-72657-DT (E.D. Mich. Sep. 8, 2006)

indicating that due process is not violated by short order denying leave to appeal for lack of merit as opposed to detailed appellate opinion as both consider case merits

Summary of this case from Wright v. Vasbinder
Case details for

Perks v. Vasbinder

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS MICHAEL PERKS, Petitioner, v. DOUGLAS VASBINDER, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Sep 8, 2006

Citations

Case No. 05-CV-72657-DT (E.D. Mich. Sep. 8, 2006)

Citing Cases

Wright v. Vasbinder

While Petitioner may have desired that more detailed attention be given to his case, the court's dismissal…

Filipunas v. Campbell

However, when the judge actually determined that Filipunas violated the terms of his probation, he did not…