rejecting the argument that a defendant could only receive an enhanced sentence under Section 4214 for one of his convictions; a defendant found eligible for habitual-offender sentencing under Section 4214 is subject to the imposition of an enhanced penalty for each count that the State enumerates in its petition
Summary of this case from Vickers v. StateNo. 360, 2009.
February 22, 2010.
Appeal from the Superior Cr 0811004552.
Decisions Without Published Opinions AFFIRMED.
rejecting the argument that a defendant could only receive an enhanced sentence under Section 4214 for one of his convictions; a defendant found eligible for habitual-offender sentencing under Section 4214 is subject to the imposition of an enhanced penalty for each count that the State enumerates in its petition
Summary of this case from Vickers v. StateFull title:Perkins v. State
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Feb 22, 2010
See Reeder v. State, 2001 WL 355732, at *3 (Del. Mar. 26, 2001) ("Each separate . conviction requires a…