From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perkins v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 16, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0422 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0422 GEB DAD P.

March 16, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis.

The application attacks a judgment of conviction entered in the Lake County Superior Court. While both this Court and the United States District Court in the district where petitioner was convicted have jurisdiction, see Braden v. 30th Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484 (1973), any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of petitioner's application are more readily available in Lake County. Id. at 499 n. 15; 28 U.S.C. § 2241(d).

Accordingly, in the furtherance of justice, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This court has not ruled on petitioner's application to proceed in forma pauperis; and

2. This matter is transferred to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California.


Summaries of

Perkins v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Mar 16, 2007
No. CIV S-07-0422 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2007)
Case details for

Perkins v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH WARREN PERKINS, Petitioner, v. D.K. SISTO, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 16, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0422 GEB DAD P (E.D. Cal. Mar. 16, 2007)