Opinion
2:06-CV-954-BR
08-09-2011
KEITH PERKINS, Plaintiff, v. STUART ROBERTS, MICHAEL LOUGHARY, GREG SHERMAN, DAN HERGERT, MARK SWANSON, LANCE ZAUGG, WILLIAM CALDERA, and CITY OF PENDLETON, by and through the Pendelton Police Department, an Oregon municipality, Defendants.
JUDGMENT
BROWN , Judge.
Following the Court's Order (#76) granting in part Defendants' Motion (#41) for Summary Judgment and the Court's Order (#80) granting Plaintiff's Motion (#79) to Dismiss Defendants Sherman, Zaugg, Caldera and City of Pendleton, this matter proceeded to jury trial on July 18-20, 2011, in Pendleton, Oregon on Plaintiff's sole remaining Section 1983 claim against Defendants Stuart Roberts, Mark Swanson, DanHergert, and Michael Loughary. At the close of the evidence, the Court granted the oral Motions of Defendants Roberts and Swanson for judgment in their favor as a matter of law, and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Hergert (for an unreasonable seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment) and against Defendant Loughary (for supervisory liability) were submitted to the jury. The Jury returned its Verdict (#121) in favor of both Defendants by finding Plaintiff did not prove Defendant Hergert violated Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment rights as alleged.
Accordingly, Judgment is now entered in favor of all Defendants and against Plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 9th day of August, 2011.
ANNA J. BROWN
United States District Judge