Perkins v. Texas National Bank of Commerce of Houston

1 Citing case

  1. Nick v. Colonial Nat. Bank of Garland

    517 S.W.2d 375 (Tex. Civ. App. 1974)   Cited 1 times

    Even if the doctor's testimony was based in part on hearsay such would not render his entire testimony inadmissible. Kellum v. Pacific Nat'l Fire Ins. Co., 360 S.W.2d 538 (Tex.Civ.App.-Dallas 1962, writ ref'd n.r.e.) and Perkins v. Texas Nat'l Bank of Commerce, 448 S.W.2d 725 (Tex.Civ.App.-Houston (1st Dist.) 1969, no writ). When we view the summary-judgment evidence in the light most favorable to the appellant guardian, as we are required to do, we conclude and so find that the professional opinion of Dr. Tripp would be admissible as evidence to establish the mental incompetency of Lucas at the time of execution of the promissory note.