From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perkins v. Napoli

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 19, 2012
08-CV-6248 CJS (W.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2012)

Opinion

08-CV-6248 CJS

07-19-2012

MICHAEL PERKINS, Plaintiff, v. D.F. NAPOLI, et al., Defendants.


DECISION AND ORDER

On September 28, 2011, the Honorable Jonathan W. Feldman, United States Magistrate Judge, issued an Order addressing several non-dispositive pre-trial motions in this action. See, Order (Docket No. 108). Rule 72(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that any objections to such a motion be filed within fourteen days, or they are waived. Plaintiff did not file a timely objection.

Instead, more than two months later, he filed a motion for reconsideration (Docket No. 112), objecting to Judge Feldman's ruling, and essentially requesting the same relief that Judge Feldman denied. Plaintiff designates the motion as being made pursuant to FRCP 60(b)(3), which provides for relief from a judgment or order obtained by fraud, misrepresentation or misconduct. "A Rule 60(b)(3) motion cannot be granted absent clear and convincing evidence of material misrepresentations, and to prevail a movant must show that the conduct complained of prevented the moving party from fully and fairly presenting his case." Entral Group Intern., LLC v. 7 Day Cafe & Bar, No. 07-1122-cv, 298 Fed.Appx. 43, 44, 2008 WL 4726306 at * 1 (2d Cir. Oct. 28, 2008) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). Plaintiff has not met this standard.

Plaintiff also filed a motion for appointment of counsel. (Docket No. 122). The Court has reviewed the application using the applicable standard, see, Hendricks v. Coughlin, 114 F.3d 390, 392 (2d Cir. 1997) and Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58 (2d Cir. 1986), and finds that appointment of counsel is not warranted.

ORDER

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED, that Plaintiff's applications [#112] & [#122] are denied. Dated: Rochester, New York

July 19, 2012

ENTER:

______________

CHARLES J. SIRAGUSA

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Perkins v. Napoli

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Jul 19, 2012
08-CV-6248 CJS (W.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Perkins v. Napoli

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL PERKINS, Plaintiff, v. D.F. NAPOLI, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Jul 19, 2012

Citations

08-CV-6248 CJS (W.D.N.Y. Jul. 19, 2012)