From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perkins v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 10, 2013
2013-3074 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 10, 2013)

Opinion

2013-3074

06-10-2013

FRANKLIN R. PERKINS, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. DA315I120162-I-1.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The Department of the Air Force moves to reform the official caption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board as the proper respondent, and to set the due date for the Board's brief as 21 days from the date of disposition of this motion. Franklin R. Perkins opposes.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed Perkins' appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The motion to reform the caption is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.

(2) The Board should calculate the due date for its brief from the date of filing of this order.

FOR THE COURT

___________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
s21


Summaries of

Perkins v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 10, 2013
2013-3074 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Perkins v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:FRANKLIN R. PERKINS, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 10, 2013

Citations

2013-3074 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 10, 2013)