From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perkins v. Lavalley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 14, 2011
11 Civ. 3855 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2011)

Opinion

11 Civ. 3855 (JGK)

12-14-2011

ANTHONY PERKINS, Petitioner, v. THOMAS LAVALLEY, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN G. KOELTL , District Judge:

The Court has received the attached pro se petitioner's application for an extension of time to file his reply memorandum. The petitioner's application is granted. The petitioner should submit his reply memorandum by January 10, 2012.

The petitioner has also requested that the Court stay his petition for habeas corpus. The Court may stay a habeas petition to allow for exhaustion of claims in state court if the petitioner can demonstrate that: (1) good cause exists for failing to exhaust the claims previously, (2) the claims are potentially meritorious, and (3) the petitioner did not intentionally engage in dilatory litigation tactics. See Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269, 277-78 (2005); Vasquez v. Parrott, 397 F.Supp.2d 452, 464 (S.D.N.Y. 2005).

In the attached letter, the petitioner acknowledges the respondent's argument that his petition includes both exhausted and unexhausted claims. However, he does not address the merits of the respondent's argument as to why the allegedly unexhausted claims are now procedurally barred and deemed exhausted. The petitioner does not assert that it is now possible for him to return to state court, where he has already concluded his direct appeal, in order to exhaust the allegedly unexhausted claims. Nor does the petitioner explain why there was good cause for his alleged failure to exhaust any claims previously, or whether any allegedly exhausted claims are potentially meritorious. If the petitioner seeks to stay consideration of his petition, he should make a motion for a stay explaining why he satisfies the requirements for a stay. To the extent that the current letter is an application for a stay, it is denied without prejudice to renewal upon a proper showing.

SO ORDERED.

Dated: New York, New York

John G. Koeltl

United States District Judge

Anthony Perkins

08 A 2935

Clinton Corr. Facility

P O Box 2000

Dannemora N.Y. 12929

THE HONORABLE John G. Baeltl
United states District Court
Southern District Of New York
New York N.Y. 10007-1312

RE: Perkins v. LAVally, 11-civ.-3855(JGK)

Dear Judge Koeltl,

I am writing, concerning the extension->of time that you granted upon my request dated November 4th and the 7th of 2011.

In that order to the records management your honor order them to send me copies of requested documents. They only send half. I wrote to them and received the other ones on about November 28, 2011.

Your Honor because of my difficulty fully understanding these legal issues and just quite how to present these argument to the court. I am force to yet again request an second extension of time to go over these papers with Home one more knowledeable than myself concerning these issues within the law library of inmates clerks. But first I must seek premission/authozation from the Superintendent of this facility. I have attached a copy of that letter.

Based on the responents response there seem to be the issue of my filling of an mixed petition of exhausted and unexhausted claims. It is my understanding of such thus far that the court should stay, rah ter then dismiss a mixed petition containing mixed claim s/issues if the petitioner has good cause for his failure to exhaust the unexhausted claim s. I ensure the court that I am not engaging in intentional dilatory litigation tactics.

I request your honors understanding that I am a layman to these matters but I am trying my best to understand these things before I present them to the courts attention for your honors consideration.

I once again thank you in advance for your time,attentiion,and consideration.

Respectfully submitted

________________________

Clinton Corr; Facility

P O Box 2000

Dannemora N.Y. 12929

cc: Alyson J. Gill

Assistant Attorney General

120 Broadway

New York N.Y. 10271- 0332

TO: Thomas La Valley, Superintendent.

Clinton Corr. Facility

From: Anthony Perkins # 08A2935

Date: December 4, 2011

RE : Request for authozation for legal assistant.

From law library staff.

Dear Sir,

IT is my understanding that in order to receive assistant from the library or for them to be in possesion of any of my legal papers I first had to seek premission or autgoraation from you.

I am at this time making such an requst to be allow to receive assistance from the staff workers with my legal work within the Southern District Of NewYork.

I thank you in advance for your attention to this matter

Respectfully

______________________

cc: District Judge Honorable John G. Koeltl

Southern District Of New York

2- Alyson J Gill

assistant Attorney General

State Of New York

3- File

Clerk of court

Pro Se Office

THE HONORABLE John G. Koeltl

United Stats District Court

Southern District Of New York

500 Pearl Street

Now York N.Y. 10007-1312

Att: Office of records management;

November 16, 2011

RE: Perkins v. Lavally civ 3855

(JGK)

DEar Sir/madam,

I recieved an order from Judge John Koeltl, which was sent to your office on 11/10/11 along with an attached letterof mf request for copies of the petition as well as all related eahibits. that were submitted with the petition on 5/23/11.

Upon recueving this information from your office two items were missing Number 2. on the affidavit of service, The brief and reply brief which was filed in the state court with the Appellate Division:First D epartment.

These items were included with the filling of the petition in this matter and I am in need of those copies as well.

I thank again for your time, attetion to my request.

Respectfully submitted

________________________

Clinton Corr; Facility

P O Box 2000

Dannemora N.Y. 12929

cc; Alyson J. Gill

Assistant Attorney General

120 Broadway

New York, N.Y. 10271-0332


Summaries of

Perkins v. Lavalley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Dec 14, 2011
11 Civ. 3855 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Perkins v. Lavalley

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY PERKINS, Petitioner, v. THOMAS LAVALLEY, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Dec 14, 2011

Citations

11 Civ. 3855 (JGK) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2011)