From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perkins v. Expedia Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 9, 2020
Case No.: 2:19-cv-01105-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 9, 2020)

Opinion

Case No.: 2:19-cv-01105-APG-DJA

01-09-2020

TIFFANY PERKINS, Plaintiff v. EXPEDIA INC., Defendant


Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case

[ECF No. 8]

On December 10, 2019, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Tiffany Perkins failed to file a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis as directed. ECF No. 8. Perkins did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)).

I THEREFORE ORDER that Judge Albregts' report and recommendation (ECF No. 8) is accepted and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.

DATED this 9th day of January, 2020.

/s/_________

ANDREW P. GORDON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Perkins v. Expedia Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jan 9, 2020
Case No.: 2:19-cv-01105-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 9, 2020)
Case details for

Perkins v. Expedia Inc.

Case Details

Full title:TIFFANY PERKINS, Plaintiff v. EXPEDIA INC., Defendant

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jan 9, 2020

Citations

Case No.: 2:19-cv-01105-APG-DJA (D. Nev. Jan. 9, 2020)