From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perkins v. Cueva

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 12, 2021
2:21-cv-01451-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01451-TLN-KJN

11-12-2021

ALONZO RAYSHAWN PERKINS, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL E. CUEVA, Defendants.


ORDER

Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On September 24, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff did not file objections to the findings and recommendations.

The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge's conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed September 24, 2021, (ECF No. 4), are adopted in full; and
2. This action is dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Perkins v. Cueva

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 12, 2021
2:21-cv-01451-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Perkins v. Cueva

Case Details

Full title:ALONZO RAYSHAWN PERKINS, Plaintiff, v. DANIEL E. CUEVA, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 12, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-01451-TLN-KJN (E.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2021)