Opinion
(5033)
Argued April 5, 1988
Decision released April 21, 1988
Action, in the first case, to recover damages for, inter alia, fraudulent misrepresentation concerning the sale of certain of the named defendant's assets, and for other relief, and action, in the second case, to recover amounts allegedly owed pursuant to an agreement not to compete, and action, in the third case, to recover under a promissory note, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Middle sex, where the matters were consolidated and tried to the court, Byrne, J.; judgment for the defendants in the first case and for the plaintiffs in the second and third cases, from which the plaintiffs in the first case and the defendants in the second and third cases appealed to this court. No error.
Charles Nessler, with whom was Charles E. Sohl, for the appellants (plaintiffs in the first case, defendants in the second and third cases).
Andrew Brand, with whom, on the brief, was Lloyd L. Langhammer, for the appellees (named defendant et al. in the first case, named plaintiff et al. in the second and third cases).
Leeland J. Cole-Chu, with whom, on the brief, was Joseph A. Cipparone, for the appellees (defendants in the first case Russell Brown et al.).