Opinion
CIVIL ACTION NO.: 5:19-cv-121
03-30-2020
ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner Mardonia Perguero's ("Perguero") "Response to the Motion to Dismiss," which the Court construes as his Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition. Dkt. No. 9. Perguero states his requested relief—to be credited with certain time against his federal sentence—was provided during the pendency of this action, and he agrees with Respondent's motion for dismissal. Id. Based on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the Court GRANTS Perguero's Motion and DISMISSES without prejudice Perguero's § 2241 Petition. Scott v. Speights, No. CA 14-0189, 2014 WL 2993726 (S.D. Ala. July 4, 2014) (recognizing applicability of Rule 41(a) to § 2241 petitions). The Court REJECTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and DENIES as moot Respondent's Motion to Dismiss. The Court also DIRECTS the Clerk of Court to CLOSE this case and enter an appropriate judgment of dismissal.
"Courts generally 'must look beyond the labels of [filings] by pro se [parties] to interpret them under whatever statute would provide relief.'" Edwards v. Hastings, No. 2:14-CV-41, 2016 WL 686386, at *1 (S.D. Ga. Feb. 18, 2016) (quoting Lofton v. Williams, No. CV415-146, 2016 WL 126408, at *2 (S.D. Ga. Jan. 11, 2016) (first alteration in original), and citing Means v. Alabama, 209 F.3d 1241, 1242 (11th Cir. 2000) (concerning pro se inmates))); Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(e) ("Pleadings must be construed so as to do justice."); Wilkerson v. Georgia, 618 F. App'x 610, 611-12 (11th Cir. 2015).
SO ORDERED, this 30 day of March, 2020.
/s/_________
HON. LISA GODBEY WOOD, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA