From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
CIV S-11-2216 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)

Opinion

CIV S-11-2216 GGH P

01-04-2012

BRANDEN PEREZ, Petitioner, v. SWARTHOUT, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Respondent filed a motion to dismiss on November 14, 2011, yet petitioner has failed to file an opposition or otherwise communicate with the court. Petitioner shall filed an opposition to the motion to dismiss within 14 days or else this case will be dismissed.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner file an opposition to the motion to dismiss within 14 days of service of this order or else this case will be dismissed.

Gregory G. Hollows

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Perez v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 4, 2012
CIV S-11-2216 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)
Case details for

Perez v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:BRANDEN PEREZ, Petitioner, v. SWARTHOUT, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 4, 2012

Citations

CIV S-11-2216 GGH P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 4, 2012)