From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 12, 1989
554 So. 2d 14 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 88-2993.

December 12, 1989.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County; Margarita Esquiroz, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Rosa C. Figarola, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Patricia Ann Ash, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and GERSTEN, JJ.


Based on a community control violation, the trial court imposed a departure sentence greater than the one cell upward increase in the guidelines provided by Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.701 d 14. See Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla. 1989). Ree v. State (Fla. Case no. 71,424, opinion filed, November 16, 1989) [14 FLW 565] conclusively establishes that such a deviation is impermissible in all circumstances. See also Ferguson v. State, 550 So.2d 1176 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), and cases cited. Accordingly, the sentence under review is reversed with directions to resentence the defendant pursuant to Rule 3.701 d 14.


Summaries of

Perez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Dec 12, 1989
554 So. 2d 14 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Perez v. State

Case Details

Full title:JULIO PEREZ, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Dec 12, 1989

Citations

554 So. 2d 14 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

Ramsey v. State

The other reasons given are based on the defendant's violation of probation and were used as a basis for a…

Padgett v. State

As the state concedes, this was erroneous. Ree v. State (Fla. Case no. 71,424, opinion filed, November 16,…