From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Spearman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 2, 2021
2:18-cv-00629 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-cv-00629 MCE DB P

07-02-2021

JOSE M. PEREZ, Petitioner, v. MARION SPEARMAN, Respondent.


ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND SENIOR UNITED STATEST DISTRTCT JUDGE

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 12, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 12, 2021 (ECF No. 16) are adopted in full;

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied; and

3. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. §2253.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Perez v. Spearman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 2, 2021
2:18-cv-00629 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Perez v. Spearman

Case Details

Full title:JOSE M. PEREZ, Petitioner, v. MARION SPEARMAN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 2, 2021

Citations

2:18-cv-00629 MCE DB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2021)