From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Oct 31, 2008
CASE NO.: 2:06-cv-2090-MCE-GGH (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2008)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 2:06-cv-2090-MCE-GGH.

October 31, 2008


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY REQUESTS


The Court, having considered Defendants' first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's discovery requests, and good cause having been found,

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants Cantu, Cortez and Williams are granted until December 5, 2008 to file responses to Plaintiff's interrogatories. Defendants Lozano and Orrick need not respond to any discovery until after the Court rules on their motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint.


Summaries of

Perez v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Oct 31, 2008
CASE NO.: 2:06-cv-2090-MCE-GGH (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2008)
Case details for

Perez v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:JOSE M. PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. D.K. SISTO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Oct 31, 2008

Citations

CASE NO.: 2:06-cv-2090-MCE-GGH (E.D. Cal. Oct. 31, 2008)