From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Runnel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 29, 2009
No. CIV S-06-1209 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2009)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1209 JAM GGH P.

April 29, 2009


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On February 9, 2009, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 9, 2009, are adopted in full;

2. The claims against defendant Rohlfing are dismissed; and

3. This action is dismissed.


Summaries of

Perez v. Runnel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 29, 2009
No. CIV S-06-1209 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2009)
Case details for

Perez v. Runnel

Case Details

Full title:MARCO PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. D.L. RUNNEL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 29, 2009

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1209 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2009)