From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Reitman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug 3, 2022
343 So. 3d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D21-1104

08-03-2022

Enrique Benedicto PEREZ, et al., Appellants, v. The ESTATE OF Ofelia REITMAN, Appellee.

Tepps Treco, and William A. Treco (Plantation), for appellants. William Wong, P.A., and William Wong, for appellee.


Tepps Treco, and William A. Treco (Plantation), for appellants.

William Wong, P.A., and William Wong, for appellee.

Before LINDSEY, HENDON, and LOBREE, JJ.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

We grant rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion, and reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing pursuant to section 45.032, Florida Statutes (2022). See § 45.032(3)(b) ("If any person other than the owner of record claims an interest in the proceeds prior to the date that the clerk reports the surplus as unclaimed or if the owner of record files a claim for the surplus but acknowledges that one or more other persons may be entitled to part or all of the surplus, the court shall set an evidentiary hearing to determine entitlement to the surplus.").

Reversed and remanded with instructions.


Summaries of

Perez v. Reitman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Aug 3, 2022
343 So. 3d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Perez v. Reitman

Case Details

Full title:Enrique Benedicto PEREZ, et al., Appellants, v. The ESTATE OF Ofelia…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Aug 3, 2022

Citations

343 So. 3d 684 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)