From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Perdomo

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 2, 2022
22-CV-0722 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 2, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-0722 (JMF)

05-02-2022

JOSE PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. ORLANDO PERDOMO, JR. et al., Defendants.


ORDER

JESSE M. FURMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

In light of the COVID-19 situation, the Court will not hold the upcoming conference in this case in person. Counsel should submit their proposed case management plan and joint letter by the Thursday prior to the conference, as directed in the Court's earlier Scheduling Order. In their joint letter, the parties should also indicate whether they can do without a conference altogether. If so, the Court may enter a case management plan and scheduling order and the parties need not appear. If not, the Court will hold the initial conference by telephone, albeit perhaps at a different time. To that end, counsel should indicate in their joint letter dates and times during the week of the conference that they would be available for a telephone conference. In either case, counsel should review and comply with the procedures for telephone conferences set forth in the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, available at https://nysd. uscourts.gov/hon-iesse-m-furman.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Perez v. Perdomo

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 2, 2022
22-CV-0722 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Perez v. Perdomo

Case Details

Full title:JOSE PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. ORLANDO PERDOMO, JR. et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 2, 2022

Citations

22-CV-0722 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. May. 2, 2022)