From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Nevarez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 14, 2012
92 A.D.3d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-02-14

Rhonda PEREZ, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. John NEVAREZ, Defendant–Appellant.


John Nevarez, appellant pro se.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (La Tia W. Martin, J.), entered March 11, 2010, which denied defendant's motion to compel discovery, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

The appeal is moot because following the issuance of the order on appeal, the motion court issued an amended order granting defendant the relief he sought, namely directing plaintiff to comply with the demand for compulsory disclosure and notice for discovery and inspection, within 45 days of the amended order.

TOM, J.P., ANDRIAS, CATTERSON, RICHTER, ABDUS–SALAAM, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Perez v. Nevarez

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Feb 14, 2012
92 A.D.3d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Perez v. Nevarez

Case Details

Full title:Rhonda PEREZ, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. John NEVAREZ, Defendant–Appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 14, 2012

Citations

92 A.D.3d 526 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 1140
938 N.Y.S.2d 434

Citing Cases

Lisiecki v. Roman Catholic Archdiocese of N.Y.

Evidence that RCANY knew or should have known that its employee sexually abused other students at plaintiff's…