From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 29, 2008
297 F. App'x 687 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 05-73617.

October 29, 2008.

Ashwani K. Bhakhri, Esquire, Burlingame, CA, for Petitioners.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Esquire, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Agency Nos. A078-368-870, A078-368-871.

Before: GRABER, FISHER and BERZON, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed on May 2, 2008 is withdrawn. A replacement memorandum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order.

Petitioners' motion to accept the late petitions for panel rehearing and for rehearing en banc is granted and we instruct the Clerk to file the petition for panel rehearing and the petition foz' rehearing en banc received on July 18, 2008.

The panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. See Fed.R.App.P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc are denied.


Summaries of

Perez v. Mukasey

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 29, 2008
297 F. App'x 687 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Perez v. Mukasey

Case Details

Full title:Jose Juan Montes PEREZ; et al., Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 29, 2008

Citations

297 F. App'x 687 (9th Cir. 2008)