From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 7, 2012
Case No. 12-12337 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 7, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 12-12337

09-07-2012

DAVID M. PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant.


Honorable John Corbett O'Meara


ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

Plaintiff David M. Perez filed an 11-count amended complaint in this court July 25, 2012, alleging the following causes of action: Count I, violations of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2, for national origin hostile work environment; Count II, the same violations arising under Michigan's Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act ("ELCRA"), Mich. Laws Comp. Ann. §§ 37.2101 et seq.; Count III, violations of Title VII for national origin discrimination; Count IV, the same violations under ELCRA; Count V, age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C.§§ 621 et seq.; Count VI, age discrimination under ELCRA; Count VII, disability discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12112; Count VIII, disability discrimination under Michigan's Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act ("PDCRA"), Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. §§ 37.1201 et seq.; Count IX, failure to accommodate under the ADA; Count X, failure to accommodate under PDCRA; and Count XI, retaliation in violation of ELCRA.

Although Plaintiff's causes of action arising under federal statutes are cognizable in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the remaining allegations present claims based solely on state law. This court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims in order to avoid jury confusion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715 (1966); and Padilla v. City of Saginaw, 867 F. Supp. 1309 (E.D. Mich. 1994).

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Counts II, IV, VI, VIII, X, and XI are DISMISSED.

John Corbett O'Meara

United States District Judge

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon the parties of record on this date, September 7, 2012, using the ECF system and/or ordinary mail.

William Barkholz

Case Manager


Summaries of

Perez v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Sep 7, 2012
Case No. 12-12337 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 7, 2012)
Case details for

Perez v. Michigan Bell Tel. Co.

Case Details

Full title:DAVID M. PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHIGAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 7, 2012

Citations

Case No. 12-12337 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 7, 2012)