From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. M. Capozza

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 22, 2023
21cv0332 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 22, 2023)

Opinion

21cv0332

09-22-2023

PERCY PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. SCI FAYETTE SUPER. M. CAPOZZA (JOHN DOE), et al., Defendant.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

ARTHUR J. SCHWAB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

The Complaint in the above captioned case was filed on March 25, 2021, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Local Rules of Court 72.C and 72.D.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 123) filed on August 21, 2023, recommended that the Motion for Summary Judgment be granted in part and denied in part as more fully set forth therein. Service was made on Plaintiff via U.S. First Class Mail and on all counsel of record via CM/ECF. In the Report and Recommendation, the parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.D.2 of the Local Rules of Court, that the parties had fourteen (14) days to file any objections (and unregistered users had seventeen (17) days to file objections). No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation to date.

After review of the pleadings and documents in the case and pending Motion/Response, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following Order is entered:

It is hereby ordered that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 107) be granted in part and denied in part. Summary Judgment is denied as to Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims for excessive force and cruel and unusual punishment against Defendants McIntyre, Meese, Newman, Gray, Sheetz, Pletcher, Weekly, Barkley, Halkias, Walters, and Shanaberger. Summary judgment is granted in favor of all Defendants on any deliberate indifference claim Plaintiff may now be arguing. Summary judgment is denied on Plaintiff's supervisory liability claim against Defendants Rhodes and Newman and granted on that claim in favor of Defendants House, Allen, and Barnacle. Summary judgment is granted as to Plaintiff's concealment claim against Defendants Rhodes, Newman, House, Allen, and Barnacle. Defendants' motion for summary judgment as to Defendant M. Capozza is denied as moot.

In accordance with the prior Order of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. 122), now that Summary Judgment has been denied on certain claims, the Magistrate Judge will undertake to attempt to find counsel to represent Plaintiff on a pro bono basis. Should that endeavor prove unsuccessful, Plaintiff shall be prepared to promptly try his case before the undersigned.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 123) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan dated August 21, 2023, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

SO ORDERED.

PERCY PEREZ DN5717 SCI Greene 175 Progress Drive Waynesburg, PA 15370


Summaries of

Perez v. M. Capozza

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Sep 22, 2023
21cv0332 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 22, 2023)
Case details for

Perez v. M. Capozza

Case Details

Full title:PERCY PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. SCI FAYETTE SUPER. M. CAPOZZA (JOHN DOE), et…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Sep 22, 2023

Citations

21cv0332 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 22, 2023)