From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Lumpkin

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
May 3, 2022
Civil Action 2:21-CV-00223 (S.D. Tex. May. 3, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:21-CV-00223

05-03-2022

LORENZO PEREZ, Petitioner, v. BOBBY LUMPKIN, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

DREW B. TIPTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pending before the Court is the November 15, 2021 Memorandum and Recommendation (“M&R”) of Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby. (Dkt. No. 9). Magistrate Judge Libby recommends that the Court dismiss Petitioner Lorenzo Perez's habeas Petition, (Dkt. No. 1), for failure to prosecute. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

Perez was provided notice and the opportunity to object. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No objections were filed, so review is for plain error. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005). No plain error appears. The Court ACCEPTS the M&R as the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order. The Court DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Perez's habeas Petition for failure to prosecute. (Dkt. No. 1).

It is SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Perez v. Lumpkin

United States District Court, Southern District of Texas
May 3, 2022
Civil Action 2:21-CV-00223 (S.D. Tex. May. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Perez v. Lumpkin

Case Details

Full title:LORENZO PEREZ, Petitioner, v. BOBBY LUMPKIN, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Texas

Date published: May 3, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 2:21-CV-00223 (S.D. Tex. May. 3, 2022)