From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Lopez

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 28, 1984
454 So. 2d 777 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 84-212.

August 28, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, Francis J. Christie, J.

Pestcoe, Slotnick Garcia and Michael Slotnick, Coral Gables, for appellant.

Simon, Schindler Hurst and Thomas M. Pflaum, Miami, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and JORGENSON, JJ.


The order under review was properly entered insofar as it acted to "freeze" or marshal assets — including corporate stock — in which the decedent may have had an interest, pending further order of the probate court in the administration of his estate. See Estate of Conger v. Conger, 414 So.2d 230 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). To the extent, however, that it directly restrains the corporations themselves, which were not made parties to the proceedings below, it is overbroad, see Gettinger v. Gettinger, 165 So.2d 757 (Fla. 1964), and should be modified to correct this defect after remand.

Affirmed as modified.

This opinion does not affect the lower court's continuing authority, as specifically recognized by the trial judge, to modify the "freeze" order, if appropriate or necessary, upon application of any interested party.


Summaries of

Perez v. Lopez

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Aug 28, 1984
454 So. 2d 777 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

Perez v. Lopez

Case Details

Full title:ELSA LOPEZ PEREZ, APPELLANT, v. AMANDA PEREZ LOPEZ, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Aug 28, 1984

Citations

454 So. 2d 777 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Nahar v. Nahar

We find no error in the trial court's order charging the marshaled assets with the cost incurred in…

Marvin Johnson, P.C. v. Superior Court

Similarly, a Florida appellate court found authority for a probate court to "freeze" or "marshal assets,"…