From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2017
Case No. EDCV 15-2290 BRO (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 15-2290 BRO (SS)

03-27-2017

JOSE LUIS RAMIREZ PEREZ, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. The time for filing Objections to the Report and Recommendation has passed and no Objections have been received. Accordingly, the Court accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. \\ \\ \\ \\ \\

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition is denied and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. DATED: March 27, 2017

/s/_________

BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Perez v. Holland

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 27, 2017
Case No. EDCV 15-2290 BRO (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2017)
Case details for

Perez v. Holland

Case Details

Full title:JOSE LUIS RAMIREZ PEREZ, Petitioner, v. KIM HOLLAND, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 27, 2017

Citations

Case No. EDCV 15-2290 BRO (SS) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 27, 2017)