From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Hi-Mike, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 19, 1995
216 A.D.2d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

June 19, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bernstein, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

CPLR 3025 (b) permits liberal amendment of the pleadings provided that the amendment does not unduly prejudice the non-moving party. The record shows that the defendant had sufficient and timely notice of the specific area in which the plaintiff's accident occurred and its possible liability for his injuries. Consequently, the defendant was not prejudiced by the court's ruling to permit amendment of the complaint merely to reflect a more accurate measurement of the accident site.

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit. Sullivan, J.P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Perez v. Hi-Mike, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 19, 1995
216 A.D.2d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Perez v. Hi-Mike, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ALADINO A. PEREZ, Respondent, v. HI-MIKE, INC., Appellant. (And a…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 19, 1995

Citations

216 A.D.2d 447 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
628 N.Y.S.2d 562