From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Gordon & Wong Law Grp. P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 3, 2011
Case No. 5:11-CV-03323-LHK-PSG (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 5:11-CV-03323-LHK-PSG

11-03-2011

CARLOS H. PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. GORDON & WONG LAW GROUP, P.C., a California corporation; AMY LOUISE GORDON, individually and in her official capacity; MITCHELL LEWIS WONG, individually and in his official capacity; and ANDREW ARNOLD FORD, individually and in his official capacity, Defendants.

Fred W. Schwinn Attorney for Plaintiff Tomio B. Narita Attorney for Defendants


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:

Court Processes:

[] Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
[×] Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs that any other form of ADR, must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5.)

Private Process:

[] Private ADR (please identify process and provider)

___________________________________________________

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:

[] the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
[] other requested deadline_________________

Fred W. Schwinn

Attorney for Plaintiff

Tomio B. Narita

Attorney for Defendants

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Pursuant to the Stipulation above, the captioned matter is hereby referred to:

[] Non-binding Arbitration
[] Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE)
[×] Mediation
[] Private ADR

Deadline for ADR session

[×] 90 days from the date of this order.
[] other_________________

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LUCY H. KOH

UNITED STATES ITISTRI CT JUDGE


Summaries of

Perez v. Gordon & Wong Law Grp. P.C.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Nov 3, 2011
Case No. 5:11-CV-03323-LHK-PSG (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Perez v. Gordon & Wong Law Grp. P.C.

Case Details

Full title:CARLOS H. PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. GORDON & WONG LAW GROUP, P.C., a California…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Nov 3, 2011

Citations

Case No. 5:11-CV-03323-LHK-PSG (N.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2011)