Opinion
No. 5D15–1874.
06-17-2016
Leonardo Perez, Apopka, pro se. Susan B. Morrison and Lauren E. Wages, Law Office of Daniel C. Consuegra, P.L., Tampa, for Appellee, Federal National Mortgage Association. No Appearance for other Appellees.
Leonardo Perez, Apopka, pro se.
Susan B. Morrison and Lauren E. Wages, Law Office of Daniel C. Consuegra, P.L., Tampa, for Appellee, Federal National Mortgage Association.
No Appearance for other Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Heilman v. Fla. Dep't of Revenue, 727 So.2d 958, 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998) (“[I]n cases involving multiple filings of removal petitions, a state court retains jurisdiction to act when the federal court subsequently denies a removal petition which is based on the same grounds as a previously denied removal petition.” (citing Farm Credit Bank of St. Paul v. Rub, 481 N.W.2d 451 (N.D.1992) )).
TORPY, BERGER and LAMBERT, JJ., concur.