From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Dennehy

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 2, 2015
2:15-cv-0833-WBS-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2015)

Opinion


JORGE ANTONIO PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. A. DENNEHY, et al., Defendants. No. 2:15-cv-0833-WBS-EFB P United States District Court, E.D. California. July 2, 2015

          ORDER

          EDMUND F. BRENNAN, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 11, 2015, the court issued findings and recommendations, which recommended dismissal of this action for plaintiff's failure to pay the required filing fee or request leave to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). ECF No. 8.

         Plaintiff filed objections on June 23, 2015, in which he submits an IFP application and explains that prison officials have delayed the processing of the required trust account certificate. The court will hold the findings and recommendations in abeyance and grant plaintiff a 60-day extension of time to file the required trust account certificate.

         Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the June 11, 2015 findings and recommendations are held in abeyance, and plaintiff has 60 days from the date of this order to submit the required trust account certificate to complete his application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Should plaintiff fail to timely comply, those findings and recommendations will be submitted to the district judge for consideration.


Summaries of

Perez v. Dennehy

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jul 2, 2015
2:15-cv-0833-WBS-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Perez v. Dennehy

Case Details

Full title:JORGE ANTONIO PEREZ, Plaintiff, v. A. DENNEHY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jul 2, 2015

Citations

2:15-cv-0833-WBS-EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 2, 2015)