From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Feb 22, 2024
No. 10246-23S (U.S.T.C. Feb. 22, 2024)

Opinion

10246-23S

02-22-2024

DAISY PEREZ & WILBERT PACHECO, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER AND DECISION

Kathleen Kerrigan, Chief Judge

On February 20, 2024, the parties filed a Proposed Stipulated Decision. Because of a typographical error contained in the proposed decision document, the Court is unable to enter it. Nevertheless, the agreement of the parties in this case is clear to the Court.

Upon due consideration, and for cause, it is

ORDERED that the parties' Proposed Stipulated Decision, filed February 20, 2024, is recharacterized as the parties' Stipulation of Settlement. In order to give effect to the basis of settlement reflected in that document, it is further

ORDERED AND DECIDED that there is no deficiency in income tax due from, nor overpayment due to, petitioners for the taxable year 2020; and

That there is no penalty due from petitioners for the taxable year 2020 under the provisions of I.R.C. sec. 6662(a).


Summaries of

Perez v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Feb 22, 2024
No. 10246-23S (U.S.T.C. Feb. 22, 2024)
Case details for

Perez v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:DAISY PEREZ & WILBERT PACHECO, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Feb 22, 2024

Citations

No. 10246-23S (U.S.T.C. Feb. 22, 2024)