From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. City of White Plains

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

December 29, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Rosato, J.).


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the defendants' contention, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying their motion for a protective order from the court's prior order which directed the production of specific police officers for depositions and permitted the plaintiffs to enter into the police precinct to photograph certain areas relevant to this case. The plaintiffs sufficiently demonstrated that the two officers previously deposed possessed insufficient knowledge of the relevant facts (see, Matter of Rattner v Planning Commn., 110 A.D.2d 840), and that photographs of the precinct were relevant to the case. Sullivan, J.P., Thompson, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Perez v. City of White Plains

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 29, 1995
222 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Perez v. City of White Plains

Case Details

Full title:ALEJA PEREZ et al., Respondents, v. CITY OF WHITE PLAINS et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 29, 1995

Citations

222 A.D.2d 663 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
635 N.Y.S.2d 670

Citing Cases

Thristino v. County of Suffolk

A corporate entity has the right to designate, in the first instance, the employee who shall be examined (…

Pisano v. Door Control, Inc.

Here, the defendant Door Control, Inc., produced its president who testified with respect to the operation,…