From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 21, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1344 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1344 MCE GGH P.

October 21, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner is represented by counsel. On 9/22/08 (Docket # 34), respondent filed a motion to dismiss the first amended petition as untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), and noticed the hearing for 10/23/08 (Docket # 33). Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 78-230(c), written opposition must be filed by no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the hearing date. Petitioner has filed no response whatever to the motion, according to the court's electronic case docket. Under L.R. 78-230(c): "[n]on party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party."

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the 10/23/08 hearing, noticed at Docket # 33, on respondent's motion to dismiss is hereby VACATED from the court's calendar and the matter, with no written opposition, is deemed submitted.


Summaries of

Perez v. Adams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 21, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1344 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2008)
Case details for

Perez v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:JOSE PEREZ, Petitioner, v. DERRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 21, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1344 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 21, 2008)