From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perez-Lopez v. Dortch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
May 11, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-312 (E.D. Tex. May. 11, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-312

05-11-2015

OSCAR PEREZ-LOPEZ v. FNU DORTCH, et al.


ORDER PARTIALLY ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff, Oscar Perez-Lopez, a prisoner currently confined at FCI Milan, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed what appeared to be a Bivens-type complaint against numerous defendants.

In Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), the Supreme Court recognized an individual's right to recover damages from federal officials for violations of constitutional rights.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends this civil rights action be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties. Plaintiff, however, did file a response requesting that his case be voluntarily dismissed. In addition, plaintiff requested the Court enter an order instructing the BOP to stop collecting the partial filing fees withdrawn from plaintiff's inmate trust account.

Regarding the latter, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) states "[n]otwithstanding subjection (a), if a prisoner brings a civil action or files an appeal in forma pauperis, the prisoner shall be required to pay the full amount of a filing fee." (emphasis added). No relief from an order directing payment of the filing fee should be granted for a voluntary dismissal. Hatchet v. Nettles, 201 F.3d 651 (5th Cir. 2000) (citing Williams v. Roberts, 116 F.3d 1126, 1128 (5th Cir. 1997).

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and the report of the Magistrate Judge is PARTIALLY ADOPTED to the extent it recommends dismissal. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations.

SIGNED this the 11 day of May, 2015.

/s/_________

Thad Heartfield

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Perez-Lopez v. Dortch

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
May 11, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-312 (E.D. Tex. May. 11, 2015)
Case details for

Perez-Lopez v. Dortch

Case Details

Full title:OSCAR PEREZ-LOPEZ v. FNU DORTCH, et al.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: May 11, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CV-312 (E.D. Tex. May. 11, 2015)