From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perea v. Montgomery

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 23, 2015
CV 14-9838-JFW(AS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)

Opinion

          Joe M Perea, Petitioner, Pro se, Calipatria, CA.

          For W. L. Montgomery, Respondent: Kenneth C Byrne, CAAG - Office of the Attorney General, California Department of Justice - Supervising Deputy AG, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          JOHN F. WALTER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, all of the records herein and the attached Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge to which no objections were filed. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the Petition with prejudice.

         IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment herein on counsel for Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

         LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition is denied and dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Perea v. Montgomery

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 23, 2015
CV 14-9838-JFW(AS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Perea v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:JOE M. PEREA, Petitioner, v. W.L. MONTGOMERY, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 23, 2015

Citations

CV 14-9838-JFW(AS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 23, 2015)