From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perdomo v. Garcia

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Apr 14, 2010
C 09-05976 JSW (N.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2010)

Opinion


ZENEIDA PERDOMO and BIOMEDA CORP., Plaintiffs, v. CARMEN GARCIA, et al., Defendants. No. C 09-05976 JSW United States District Court, N.D. California. April 14, 2010

          ORDER (1) CONTINUING HEARING AND (2) SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

          JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.

         Defendants Public Storage and U.S. Bank, National Association, erroneously sued as U.S. Bancorp filed motions to motion to dismiss and noticed them to be heard on May 14, 2010. The Court HEREBY CONTINUES the hearing on these motions to June 11, 2010. Defendants Valley of California, Inc. dba Coldwell Banker Residential Brokerage and Brenda Oliveira also filed a motion to dismiss and noticed it to be heard on June 11, 2010. The Court FURTHER ORDERS that any opposition to these three motions shall be filed by no later than April 28, 2010 and any reply briefs shall be filed by no later than May 5, 2010.

         If the Court determines that the matter is suitable for resolution without oral argument, it will so advise the parties in advance of the hearing date. If the parties wish to modify this schedule, they may submit for the Court's consideration a stipulation and proposed order demonstrating good cause for any modification requested.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Perdomo v. Garcia

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California
Apr 14, 2010
C 09-05976 JSW (N.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Perdomo v. Garcia

Case Details

Full title:ZENEIDA PERDOMO and BIOMEDA CORP., Plaintiffs, v. CARMEN GARCIA, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, N.D. California

Date published: Apr 14, 2010

Citations

C 09-05976 JSW (N.D. Cal. Apr. 14, 2010)