From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perano v. Township of Tilden

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 12, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00754 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 12, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00754.

April 12, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW this 12th day of April, 2010, upon consideration of Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 28 and 29), the responses of Plaintiff (Docket Nos. 30 and 31), Defendants' replies (Docket Nos. 34 and 35), the parties' oral arguments at the March 12, 2010 hearing, and Defendants' Supplemental Exhibits (Doc. No. 40); and after a complete and independent review of the Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 27), it is ORDERED that the Motions to Dismiss (Doc. Nos. 28 and 29) are GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned action is DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.


Summaries of

Perano v. Township of Tilden

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Apr 12, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00754 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 12, 2010)
Case details for

Perano v. Township of Tilden

Case Details

Full title:FRANK T. PERANO, Plaintiff, v. TOWNSHIP OF TILDEN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Apr 12, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00754 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 12, 2010)

Citing Cases

Professional Dog Breeders Advisory Council, Inc. v. Wolff

Id.Perano v. Twp. of Tilden, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36781, at **15-17 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 12, 2010). For the…

Tomino v. City of Bethlehem

Accordingly, plaintiff must identify similarly situated individuals who were treated differently and provide…