From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Perales v. Daniels

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 6, 2023
23-CV-0781 (SRN/TNL) (D. Minn. Jul. 6, 2023)

Opinion

23-CV-0781 (SRN/TNL)

07-06-2023

Richard A. Perales, Plaintiff, v. Jack Daniels, Chief Psychiatrist; and Dionne Hart, Staff Psychiatrist, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING IFP STATUS

SUSAN RICHARD NELSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court recently granted plaintiff Richard A. Perales's application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal. See Dkt. No. 6. As part of that Order, Perales was directed to pay an initial partial filing fee of at least $14.98 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). That provision, however, applies only to prisoners, and Perales is not a prisoner within the meaning of § 1915(h). Accordingly, the Court's prior Order will be vacated, and Perales will not be directed to pay an initial partial filing fee in prosecution of his appeal. To be clear, however, Perales may proceed IFP on appeal, and his IFP application will again be granted notwithstanding the prior Order being vacated.

CONCLUSION

Based on the submissions and the entire file and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that

1. The Court's June 30, 2023 Order [Dkt. No. 6] is VACATED.
2. The application to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal of plaintiff Richard A. Perales [Dkt. No. 5] is GRANTED.
3. The Clerk of Court shall provide notice to the authorities at the institution where Perales is confined that Perales does not owe a financial obligation to the Court in prosecution of his appeal.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Perales v. Daniels

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 6, 2023
23-CV-0781 (SRN/TNL) (D. Minn. Jul. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Perales v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:Richard A. Perales, Plaintiff, v. Jack Daniels, Chief Psychiatrist; and…

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jul 6, 2023

Citations

23-CV-0781 (SRN/TNL) (D. Minn. Jul. 6, 2023)