From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Peragallo v. Oneto

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 17, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 889 (N.J. 1926)

Opinion

Decided May 17th, 1926.

On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Griffin, whose opinion is reported in 98 N.J. Eq. 74.

Mr. Anthony P. La Porta, for the respondent.

Messrs. Stuhr Vogt, for the appellants.


The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Griffin.

For affirmance — TRENCHARD, PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, CAMPBELL, WHITE, GARDNER, VAN BUSKIRK, McGLENNON, KAYS, HETFIELD, JJ. 13.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Peragallo v. Oneto

Court of Errors and Appeals
May 17, 1926
99 N.J. Eq. 889 (N.J. 1926)
Case details for

Peragallo v. Oneto

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS PERAGALLO, respondent, v. PHILIP ONETO et al., appellants

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: May 17, 1926

Citations

99 N.J. Eq. 889 (N.J. 1926)

Citing Cases

Rizzi v. Pohan

The defense interposed by her husband was her defense. If her husband prevailed, the judgment would operate…