Summary
In Herbert v. City of Eugene, 45 Or. App. 336, 608 P.2d 1189 (1980), petitioners appeal from that portion of LCDC's final order that upheld the industrial rezoning.
Summary of this case from Willamette University v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOpinion
Argued and Submitted Nov. 8, 1979.
Robert E. Stacey, Jr., Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners.
John B. Arnold, Eugene, argued the cause for respondent City of Eugene. With him on the brief were Stanton F. Long, Timothy J. Sercombe, and Johnson, Harrangs&sMercer, Eugene.
Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Land Conservation and Development Commission and Department of Land Conservation and Development, W. J. Kvarsten, Director. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., and Walter L. Barrie, Sol. Gen., Salem.
Vernon D. Gleaves, Eugene, argued the cause for intervenors-respondents. With him on the brief were Michael E. Farthing, and Butler, Husk, Gleavess&sSwearingen, Eugene.
James M. Mattis, League of Oregon Cities, Eugene, filed a brief amicus curiae on behalf of the League of Oregon Cities.
Before SCHWAB, C. J., and RICHARDSON and JOSEPH, , JJ.
JOSEPH, J., vice LEE, J., deceased.
PER CURIAM.
Reversed and remanded. Williamette University v. LCDC, 45 Or.App. 355, 608 P.2d 1178 (decided this date).