PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Full title: PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: May 12, 1982

57 Or. App. 429 (Or. Ct. App. 1982)

57 Or. App. 429

644 P.2d 1142

Opinion

644 P.2d 668 (Or.App. 1982) 57 Or.App. 429 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. James Harold RUDD, Appellant. No. 37983; CA A21743. Court of Appeals of Oregon. May 12, 1982

       Argued and Submitted March 29, 1982.

       Kenneth A. Morrow, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Morrow, McCreas&sDivita, Eugene.

       Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

       Before GILLETTE, P. J., and WARDEN and YOUNG, JJ.

       PER CURIAM.

       Affirmed. State v. Lopez, 56 Or.App. 179, 641 P.2d 596 (1982).