PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Full title: PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 2, 1978

36 Or. App. 345 (Or. Ct. App. 1978)

36 Or. App. 345

584 P.2d 795

584 P.2d 367

Opinion

585 P.2d 23 (Or.App. 1978) 36 Or.App. 345 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Nancy Lee SCHARF, Appellant. No. T 82694; CA 10121. Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc. October 2, 1978

Argued and Submitted April 24, 1978.

Resubmitted in Banc on Records and Briefs Sept. 27, 1978.

Philip Hayter, Dallas, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Hayter, Shetterly, Noble & Weiser, Dallas.

Donald L. Paillette, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., and Al J. Laue, Sol. Gen., Salem.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed by an equally divided court.