From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 27, 1988
92 Or. App. 360 (Or. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion


757 P.2d 875 (Or.App. 1988) 92 Or.App. 360 State v. Henderson STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. David Leroy HENDERSON, Appellant. 87-0431; 87-0481; CA A45003; CA A45004. Court of Appeals of Oregon. July 27, 1988

       Argued and Submitted March 31, 1988.

       Marsha Mussehl, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

       Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

       Before WARDEN, P.J., and VAN HOOMISSEN and GRABER, JJ.

       PER CURIAM.

       Minimum sentence in case no. 87-0481 vacated. State v. Hardesty, 298 Or. 616, 619, 695 P.2d 569 (1985). Judgment otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 27, 1988
92 Or. App. 360 (Or. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Case Details

Full title:PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 27, 1988

Citations

92 Or. App. 360 (Or. Ct. App. 1988)
92 Or. App. 360
758 P.2d 379