PER CURIAM OPINIONS

1 Citing case

  1. State v. Ellison

    725 P.2d 363 (Or. 1986)   Cited 7 times
    In State v. Ellison, 301 Or. 676, 725 P.2d 363 (1986), the Supreme Court determined that the defendant could be tried in separate prosecutions for driving with a suspended license and falsely identifying himself, because the two crimes had not occurred simultaneously and were motivated by two independent criminal objectives. Under similar analysis, defendants constitutional rights were not violated. The facts underlying the charges against each defendant occurred on different days and sometimes involved different participants.

    On review from the Court of Appeals. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lane County, William A. Beckett, Judge. 78 Or. App. 194, 714 P.2d 1082 (1986). Ernest E. Estes, Deputy Public Defender for Oregon, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the petition was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender for Oregon, Salem.