PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Full title: PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 28, 1989

97 Or. App. 432 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)

97 Or. App. 432

Opinion

775 P.2d 930 (Or.App. 1989) 97 Or.App. 432 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Mark Alan MURRAY, Appellant. 10-87-08999; CA A47865. Court of Appeals of Oregon. June 28, 1989

       Argued and Submitted May 26, 1989.

       David E. Groom, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

       Meg Reeves, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

       Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

       PER CURIAM.

       Affirmed. State v. Mendez, 307 Or. 245, 767 P.2d 75 (1988); State v. Boots, 94 Or.App. 713, 767 P.2d 450, rev. allowed, 308 Or. 33, 774 P.2d 1108 (1989).