PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Full title: PER CURIAM OPINIONS

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 1, 1981

52 Or. App. 599 (Or. Ct. App. 1981)

52 Or. App. 599

629 P.2d 422

629 P.2d 421

Opinion

628 P.2d 793 (Or.App. 1981) 52 Or.App. 599 In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Wayne Edmund HOLM, Appellant, and Sharon Darby Holm, Respondent. No. D7903-61644; CA 18809. Court of Appeals of Oregon. June 1, 1981

       Argued and Submitted April 27, 1981.

       James D. Case, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Cases&sDusterhoff, Portland.

       Frederick S. Carman, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lewis B. Hampton, and Bolliger, Hamptons&s Tarlow, P. C., Portland.

       Before BUTTLER, P. J., and WARDEN and WARREN, JJ.

       PER CURIAM.

       Affirmed. No costs to either party. Smith and Smith, 290 Or. 567, 624 P.2d 114 (1981); Ditto and Ditto, 52 Or. App. 609, 628 P.2d 777 (June 1, 1981); Padbury and Padbury, 46 Or.App. 533, 612 P.2d 321 (1980).