PER CURIAM OPINION

Full title: PER CURIAM OPINION

Court: Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 17, 1987

86 Or. App. 222 (Or. Ct. App. 1987)

86 Or. App. 222

Opinion

737 P.2d 1255 (Or.App. 1987) 86 Or.App. 222 STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Winona Elizabeth THOMPSON, Appellant. C-7032; CA A42336. Court of Appeals of Oregon. June 17, 1987

       Argued and Submitted April 3, 1987.

       Steven B. Reed, Rainier, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Stephen D. Petersen, P.C., Rainier.

       Thomas H. Denney, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

       Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

       PER CURIAM.

       Affirmed. State v. Maynard, 85 Or.App. 631, 738 P.2d 210 (1987).