From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PER CURIAM OPINION

Oregon Supreme Court
Feb 3, 1987
302 Or. 593 (Or. 1987)

Opinion


731 P.2d 1045 (Or. 1987) 302 Or. 593 STATE of Oregon, Petitioner on review, v. Mitchell E. HUTCHINSON, Respondent on review. CC 10-82-00745; CA A28272; SC S32942. Supreme Court of Oregon. February 3, 1987

       Argued and Submitted Oct. 8, 1986.

        On review from the Court of Appeals.

Appeal from Lane County Circuit Court, James R. Hargreaves, Judge. 79 Or.App. 379, 717 P.2d 1292 (1986).

       Stephen F. Peifer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petition on review. On the petition for review were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Asst. Sol. Gen., Salem.

        Timothy J. Sercombe, Eugene, and Rex Armstrong, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review. With Rex Armstrong on the response to the petition for review was Edward E. Hill, of Larry O. Gildea, P.C., Eugene.

       Before PETERSON, C.J., and LENT, LINDE, CAMPBELL, CARSON and JONES, JJ.

       PER CURIAM.

        The Court of Appeals is affirmed. State v. Henry, 302 Or. 510, 732 P.2d 9 (1987).


Summaries of

PER CURIAM OPINION

Oregon Supreme Court
Feb 3, 1987
302 Or. 593 (Or. 1987)
Case details for

PER CURIAM OPINION

Case Details

Full title:PER CURIAM OPINION

Court:Oregon Supreme Court

Date published: Feb 3, 1987

Citations

302 Or. 593 (Or. 1987)
302 Or. 593